Pluralistic ignorance posits that in
certain circumstances most people will falsely believe that others conform to
certain ideas or standards, and will uphold them, too, while privately
disagreeing with them. Since there is a fear of disagreeing with what is
believed to be the norm, situations or behaviors continue that few people
actually endorse. This is a social psychology concept that was first brought to attention in the 1930s by Floyd
Allport and Daniel Katz. It can also be called a mistaken belief in a person’s
uniqueness, which stands in the way of action or change.
One example of pluralistic ignorance
occurs in a type of social phenomenon called the bystander effect, which has
been well observed in group settings. When a person is a victim to a crime, a
greater number of people observing it translates to less likelihood of anyone
intervening. All share the mistaken belief that someone else will step in and
help.
Even if each person deplores the crime
and believes that someone should help, he or she strongly ascribes to the idea
that the helper will be another individual. For this reason, in self-defense
classes, people are often taught to make an appeal to a single individual to
shake that person from the pluralistic view. Moreover, if several people start
helping, it’s likely most of the group will begin to intervene, too.
Other examples of pluralistic ignorance
are not difficult to find. Many Germans living during World War II privately
deplored the actions of Hitler, but thought they were the only ones who did.
Similarly, many white Southerners in the US detested slavery or the Jim Crow
laws that followed. Since they believed their views were unique, they did not
step forward to seek justice on behalf of African Americans. During the 1960s
Civil Rights movement, though, many white Southerners participated with vigor
because they realized numerous people shared their personal abhorrence of
discrimination.
It could be said that pluralistic
ignorance is an ironic desire to conform to a larger group. People act or fail
to act based on a false idea of the values that group holds, and a belief that
any differences from the group are a minority opinion. This is irony because
the estimation of what the group believes is incorrect, and most members
actually share an opinion in opposition to the values the group upholds.
Numerous social
psychology researchers have studied pluralistic ignorance in
different settings. It has been examined in bullying behavior, in college
drinking attitudes, and in a variety of settings where ethics and values are
upheld or ignored. These studies seem to suggest that pluralistic ignorance is
common, and a desire to be part of the group may lead individuals and whole
groups to retain norms with which they really fundamentally disagree.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario